Call me a cynic, call me a skeptic. Whenever a hotspot flares up in the world, I invariably find myself exploring for deeper meanings instead of just accepting the perspective offered up by CNN.

The current situation involving Georgia, Russia and South Ossetia has certainly given me plenty to ponder.

As a brief history, as the Russian empire expanded in the 18th and 19th centuries, the tribal people of Ossetia generally sided with the Russians instead of trying to fight them. In the 1920's, this loyalty seems to have been rewarded when Russia established the South Ossetian Autonomous Region which today lies inside the breakaway Republic of Georgia.

As the Soviet Union began its fade to black as the Communist model failed, Georgian nationalist leader Zviad Gamsakhurdia began locking horns with South Ossetia. Violence flared in 1990 as South Ossetia declared its intention to secede from Georgia. When the Soviet Union officially failed in 1991-1992, South Ossetia ramped up its separatist rhetoric. Clashes followed and casualties mounted

Fast forward to the present and we see that the situation has again flared up. But this time, the dynamic is different and this invites a series of questions.